All data distributed here has been FULLY superceded by the pair of papers Blanton et al. (2003c) and Blanton et al. 2003d (for which I give web pages and data distributions).
This page presents the non-parametric fits to the luminosity function of galaxies from commissioning data of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. This survey will eventually obtain one million galaxy redshifts for galaxies with r<17.65 or so. This work is based only on one percent of that data. Most of the pertinent information regarding the measurement of the luminosity function is in the accompanying paper:
For more general information about the SDSS, see the technical overview given by:
Description of the results is given below. Please contact me with problems, questions, discrepancies, etc.
[M] [PhiHat(M)] [LogError]
"M" is the center of each absolute magnitude bin; "PhiHat(M)" is the number density per unit magnitude in that bin; "LogError" is the logarithmic (base 10) error in the number density (these are really the diagonal elements of the covariance matrix, which is -- it turns out -- non-diagonal). Values of zero indicate that no data is available for that bin.
The non-parametric fit to the joint distribution of luminosity and some other property are given in the following files for each property:
These results are only given for a flat, lambda-dominated universe with a matter density of 0.3. The format is very similar to that of the luminosity function. Each line represents a bin, and has the format:
[M] [Property] [PhiHat(M,Property)] [LogError]
"M" is the center of each absolute magnitude bin; "Property" is the center of each bin in the given property; "PhiHat(M,Property)" is the number density per unit magnitude per unit property in that bin; "LogError" is the logarithmic (base 10) error in the number density (these are really the diagonal elements of the covariance matrix, which is -- it turns out -- non-diagonal). Values of zero indicate that no data is available for that bin.
Note that there was an error in these joint LF files previous to 3/29/2002 which was that they were normalized incorrectly. The correct normalization is now given in the tables.